Tags
bibeln, jesus, kristendom, Kristus, non-violence, religion, theology, thoughts, tradition
The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them.
The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox.
The infant will play near the hole of the cobra, and the young child put his hand into the viper’s nest.
They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea.
Among others, Cyril of Alexandria considered Isaiah’s prophecy as already fulfilled in a metaphorical way. He wrote that knowledge of the Lord had already come with Jesus Christ and that it dwells on the Holy Mountain-like Church to where animalistic heathens are drawn. Martin Luther followed the same line but was especially concerned that all should be allowed to come to Jesus without any outside force.
But Irenaeus of Lyons disagrees with Cyril’s metaphorical approach. Iraneus accepts the text’s message as it is. Thus he connects it with the world situation that the Lord, Our God, had originally planned for us. We can, by accepting The Word, Jesus Christ, and His sacrifice, live in that atmosphere, being free from sin and its consequent disharmony. Irenaeus points out that when the Lord’s Peace makes even the animals like lions to tranquilly eat straw, why would (or should) man commit violence just to fill his belly?
We too can ponder Irenaeus words. An important consideration to make is that if the time prophesied already began 2000 years ago because our Lord Jesus being here on earth, aren’t we supposed to try and live accordingly: in harmony with all of God’s creatures great and small without any trace of violence? And on the other hand, if the Day of The Lord is yet to come in an undefined future (Mark 13:32), shouldn’t we try to be ready for that day by starting already now to “neither harm nor destroy”?
“It will be good for those servants whose master finds them ready” (Luke 12:38).
…
From part of an exegetic essay I wrote this week on Isaiah 11:6-9. Literature used: New International Version of the Holy Bible; Childs, Brevard S. (2004). The Struggle to Understand Isaiah as Christian Scripture. Louisville: Westminster John Knox; Wilken, Robert Louis (2007). Isaiah, Interpreted by Early Christian and Medieval Commentators. (From: The Church’s Bible) Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Eerdmans
tachr said:
Very nice. I would like to be ready….
LikeLike
suri said:
No dissagreement there!
LikeLike
Micael Grenholm said:
Nice blog you have! Do you know Joel Gabrielsson? He’s also studying at Johannelund.
Blessings!
LikeLike
suri said:
Micael,
Thanks for stopping by. Your blogs are nice too!
I know who Joel is but haven’t spoken to him. I found your blogs through Peter Berntssons blog.
Peace!
LikeLike
Peter Berntsson said:
Good reflections!
I can’t help but ask, though: why does it have to be either or? 🙂
I believe most promises in the Bible have several layers of fulfillment. The traditional Christian view on OT prophecies is that “all the promises of God find their Yes in Him [Christ]”, 2 Cor 1:20.
While it did cause problems when pushed to be a rigid system, the Patristic way of interpreting especially prophetic Scripture is that they have four kinds of interpretation: Literal/historical, Moral, Allegorical and Anagogic. So basically, there’s a literal meaning, there’s a moral meaning, there’s allegorical things that can be drawn from it, and there is a dimension in which it speaks of the realities of the New World (anagogical, from “lead up” in the Greek).
So Christ did fulfill everything, and the whole Kingdom is present now in Him. And in a sense, we are the lions and the lambs coming to lie together in peace at his feet.
But I also believe the literal lions and lambs will lie together when the Kingdom has come in Glory, fully.
LikeLike
suri said:
Thanks for your comment, Peter!
Yes, I did choose one of many possible interpretations (as you know we had only so much space to write this in our interpretations). Perhaps I was also trying to prove a point (sorry 😉 ).
Yes, it could (or should) actually mean both “now in us” and “then in all”. But I would like to add “for all now” since as you quote beautifully: “all the promises of God find their Yes in Him” and He is already here…
He Is!
/Sunniva
LikeLike